Dawsey v. Nebel

629 So. 2d 402, 1993 La. LEXIS 3426, 1993 WL 491003
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 22, 1993·No. No. 93-C-2866·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Dawsey, Pamela M.; Martindale, Nathan Andrew; Martindale, Heide Beloved; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA93 0395; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 91-14099.

Granted. Although cancellation of a notice of lis pendens is an interlocutory judgment, relator has made a sufficient showing under the facts of this case that the sale of the immovable property would cause her irreparable harm. La.Code Civ.P. art. 2083. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal dismissing relator’s appeal is vacated and set aside. Relator’s suspensive appeal is reinstated. Case remanded to the court of appeal for further proceedings.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dawsey v. Nebel, 629 So. 2d 402, 1993 La. LEXIS 3426, 1993 WL 491003 (La. 1993).

629 So. 2d 402 (Dawsey v. Nebel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dawsey v. Negal
647 So. 2d 1084 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)