Dawsey v. Nebel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Dawsey v. Nebel

629 So. 2d 402, 1993 La. LEXIS 3426, 1993 WL 491003

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 22, 1993

DocketNo. 93-C-2866

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 629 So. 2d 402 (Dawsey v. Nebel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dawsey v. Nebel, 629 So. 2d 402, 1993 La. LEXIS 3426, 1993 WL 491003 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Dawsey, Pamela M.; Martindale, Nathan Andrew; Martindale, Heide Beloved; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA93 0395; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 91-14099.

Granted. Although cancellation of a notice of lis pendens is an interlocutory judgment, relator has made a sufficient showing under the facts of this case that the sale of the immovable property would cause her irreparable harm. La.Code Civ.P. art. 2083. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal dismissing relator’s appeal is vacated and set aside. Relator’s suspensive appeal is reinstated. Case remanded to the court of appeal for further proceedings.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dawsey, Pamela M.; Martindale, Nathan Andrew; Martindale, Heide Beloved; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA93 0395; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 91-14099.

Granted. Although cancellation of a notice of lis pendens is an interlocutory judgment, relator has made a sufficient showing under the facts of this case that the sale of the immovable property would cause her irreparable harm. La.Code Civ.P. art. 2083. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal dismissing relator’s appeal is vacated and set aside. Relator’s suspensive appeal is reinstated. Case remanded to the court of appeal for further proceedings.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

629 So. 2d 402, 1993 La. LEXIS 3426, 1993 WL 491003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawsey-v-nebel-la-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack