Dawn v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Dawn v. Commonwealth

295 S.W. 979, 220 Ky. 686, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 588

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

DecidedJune 21, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 295 S.W. 979 (Dawn v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dawn v. Commonwealth, 295 S.W. 979, 220 Ky. 686, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 588 (Ky. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Logan

Affirming.

Appellant was indicted for the crime of murder. The jury found him guilty of manslaughter, and fixed his punishment at 18 years in the penitentiary. He complains only of the failure of the court to grant him a continuance or to allow him to file an affidavit showing what he could prove by absent witnesses. He filed an affidavit with his motion and grounds for a new trial. From this affidavit we gather that his witnesses had been subpoenaed to appear in court, but, when the trial was called, two of them were not present The court directed a warrant of arrest to issue for them, but they were not apprehended and brought to court. We have examined the affidavit in connection with the evidence in the case, and it does not appear to us that the evidence was of sufficient importance to have influenced the jury to return a different verdict. There was no motion for a continuance, and there is nothing in the record showing that there was an offer to file an affidavit in support of any motion for a continuance. The record is entirely silent on these points. The appellant, therefore, is not in position to raise the question here.

The instructions given by the court are correct. We have considered the record, and have reached the conclusion that there was no error which was prejudicial to the rights of appellant.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Logan

Affirming.

Appellant was indicted for the crime of murder. The jury found him guilty of manslaughter, and fixed his punishment at 18 years in the penitentiary. He complains only of the failure of the court to grant him a continuance or to allow him to file an affidavit showing what he could prove by absent witnesses. He filed an affidavit with his motion and grounds for a new trial. From this affidavit we gather that his witnesses had been subpoenaed to appear in court, but, when the trial was called, two of them were not present The court directed a warrant of arrest to issue for them, but they were not apprehended and brought to court. We have examined the affidavit in connection with the evidence in the case, and it does not appear to us that the evidence was of sufficient importance to have influenced the jury to return a different verdict. There was no motion for a continuance, and there is nothing in the record showing that there was an offer to file an affidavit in support of any motion for a continuance. The record is entirely silent on these points. The appellant, therefore, is not in position to raise the question here.

The instructions given by the court are correct. We have considered the record, and have reached the conclusion that there was no error which was prejudicial to the rights of appellant.

Judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 S.W. 979, 220 Ky. 686, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawn-v-commonwealth-kyctapphigh-1927.