Dawley v. City of Antigo

97 N.W. 1119, 120 Wis. 302, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 81
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 12, 1904·Published

Opinion

Siebeoeee, J.

The plaintiff is a resident and property •owner of the city of Antigo, and brought this action to declare a special tax and assessment for sprinkling certain [303]*303.streets in the city, invalid, and that the cloud attempted to be created upon the title to lots owned by him, as a result, of such assessment, be removed. The facts in this case are identical with the facts in the case of Borgman v. Antigo, ante, p. 296, 97 N. W. 936, except that respondent in this ■case did not sign a petition for sprinkling any of the streets in the city of Antigo. The case is .ruled by the Borgman ■Case. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

By the Court. — -The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dawley v. City of Antigo, 97 N.W. 1119, 120 Wis. 302, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 81 (Wis. 1904).

97 N.W. 1119 (Dawley v. City of Antigo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Borgman v. City of Antigo
97 N.W. 936 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1904)