Dawley v. City of Antigo
This text of 97 N.W. 1119 (Dawley v. City of Antigo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff is a resident and property •owner of the city of Antigo, and brought this action to declare a special tax and assessment for sprinkling certain [303]*303.streets in the city, invalid, and that the cloud attempted to be created upon the title to lots owned by him, as a result, of such assessment, be removed. The facts in this case are identical with the facts in the case of Borgman v. Antigo, ante, p. 296, 97 N. W. 936, except that respondent in this ■case did not sign a petition for sprinkling any of the streets in the city of Antigo. The case is .ruled by the Borgman ■Case. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
By the Court. — -The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 N.W. 1119, 120 Wis. 302, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawley-v-city-of-antigo-wis-1904.