Dawkins v. Triplett
This text of Dawkins v. Triplett (Dawkins v. Triplett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7919
JAMES EDWARD DAWKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARK TRIPLETT, Officer of Catawba County; TONY A. KELLER, Lieutenant of Catawba County,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CATAWBA COUNTY; L. DAVID HUFFMAN, Sheriff of Catawba County,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-171)
Submitted: May 14, 2003 Decided: May 28, 2003
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Edward Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Alison Raney Bost, Andrew Christian Buckner, Robert Danny Mason, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, P.L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Dawkins appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reimbursement of costs. We have
independently reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Dawkins v. Triplett, No. CA-97-171 (W.D.N.C. filed Oct.
31, 2002; entered Nov. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dawkins v. Triplett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawkins-v-triplett-ca4-2003.