Dawkins v. Thomas Hair & Scalp Corp.

244 S.E.2d 88, 145 Ga. App. 568, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2043
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 4, 1978
Docket55313
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 244 S.E.2d 88 (Dawkins v. Thomas Hair & Scalp Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dawkins v. Thomas Hair & Scalp Corp., 244 S.E.2d 88, 145 Ga. App. 568, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2043 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Appellant filed suit against appellee alleging fraud in the inducement to contract; subsequently, he amended his petition alleging a breach of warranty. After discovery, the appellant’s attorney withdrew as attorney of record and the appellant represented himself.

Although a pre-trial conference was held, no written order was taken. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment; the motions were denied. Subsequently, the case was tried before a jury and verdict rendered for the appellee. Motion for new trial was also denied. Held:

1. The failure to enter a pre-trial conference order [569]*569was not error absent a showing of harmful error to the appellant. Yeomans v. Smith, 130 Ga. App. 574 (203 SE2d 926). None appears here.

Submitted January 30, 1978 Decided April 4, 1978. Jerry Dawkins, pro se. Louis F. Ricciuti, for appellee.

2. Appellant failed to object to the charge given by the trial court; therefore, the appellant is precluded from raising this issue for the first time on appeal. Jones v. Hutchins, 131 Ga. App. 808 (207 SE2d 224); Baxter v. Bryan, 122 Ga. App. 817 (178 SE2d 724).

3. There appears nothing in the record to indicate that the appellant was "sold out” by his attorney or that the trial court conducted the trial in any manner detrimental to the appellant; on the contrary, the trial court gave the appellant, as his own counsel, great latitude in the trial of his case.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kilgore v. State
274 S.E.2d 332 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
DeVane v. Smith
268 S.E.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Daniel
260 S.E.2d 20 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 S.E.2d 88, 145 Ga. App. 568, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawkins-v-thomas-hair-scalp-corp-gactapp-1978.