Dawkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dawkins v. State

686 So. 2d 756, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1997 WL 12931

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dawkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3205 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 1997·No. No. 94-04594·Published

Opinion

DAKAN, STEPHEN L., Associate Judge.

We find no merit in the issues Lamaise Dawkins raises concerning the lower court’s denial of his motion to suppress, the term of probation it imposed and the conditions of probation. We, therefore, affirm these points without discussion. We strike the trial court’s assessment of a $15.00 fee for the court improvement fund. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We remand for the lower court to modify the order of probation accordingly.

Affirmed in part, cost stricken and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAKAN, STEPHEN L., Associate Judge.

We find no merit in the issues Lamaise Dawkins raises concerning the lower court’s denial of his motion to suppress, the term of probation it imposed and the conditions of probation. We, therefore, affirm these points without discussion. We strike the trial court’s assessment of a $15.00 fee for the court improvement fund. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We remand for the lower court to modify the order of probation accordingly.

Affirmed in part, cost stricken and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Dawkins v. State, 686 So. 2d 756, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1997 WL 12931 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

686 So. 2d 756 (Dawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related