Dawkins v. State

686 So. 2d 756, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1997 WL 12931
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1997
DocketNo. 94-04594
StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 756 (Dawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dawkins v. State, 686 So. 2d 756, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1997 WL 12931 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

DAKAN, STEPHEN L., Associate Judge.

We find no merit in the issues Lamaise Dawkins raises concerning the lower court’s denial of his motion to suppress, the term of probation it imposed and the conditions of probation. We, therefore, affirm these points without discussion. We strike the trial court’s assessment of a $15.00 fee for the court improvement fund. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We remand for the lower court to modify the order of probation accordingly.

Affirmed in part, cost stricken and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 756, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1997 WL 12931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawkins-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.