Dawkins v. State
This text of 686 So. 2d 756 (Dawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no merit in the issues Lamaise Dawkins raises concerning the lower court’s denial of his motion to suppress, the term of probation it imposed and the conditions of probation. We, therefore, affirm these points without discussion. We strike the trial court’s assessment of a $15.00 fee for the court improvement fund. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We remand for the lower court to modify the order of probation accordingly.
Affirmed in part, cost stricken and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 756, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1997 WL 12931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawkins-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.