Dawkins v. State
This text of 501 So. 2d 188 (Dawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the sentencing hearing Gerald Daw-kins was orally adjudicated guilty of armed trespass and aggravated battery in accordance with his pleas; however, the final judgment filed the same day recites that Dawkins is guilty of armed burglary and aggravated battery. The written judgment must not vary from the court's oral pronouncement. Durick v. State, 476 So.2d 317 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court for correction of the error. The judgment and sentence are affirmed in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 So. 2d 188, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 413, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawkins-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.