Dawkins v. . Phillips

116 S.E. 723, 185 N.C. 608, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 127
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 11, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 116 S.E. 723 (Dawkins v. . Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dawkins v. . Phillips, 116 S.E. 723, 185 N.C. 608, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 127 (N.C. 1923).

Opinion

Pee CuexaM.

C. S., 1444, provides that at criminal terms of tbe court “motions for civil action may be beard upon due notice, and trials in civil actions may be beard by consent of tbe parties.” The order to dismiss was made at a special criminal term, and without notice being given of such motion. This being a civil action, tbe judgment of dismissal must be

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laws v. Laws
161 S.E.2d 40 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1968)
Beck v. Lexington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
5 S.E.2d 855 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 723, 185 N.C. 608, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawkins-v-phillips-nc-1923.