Dawkins v. Dewalt

Fourth Circuit

Dawkins v. Dewalt

34 F. App'x 956

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 23, 2002·No. No. 02-6228·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Dawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dawkins v. Dewalt, No. CA-02-10-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2002). We deny Dawkins’ motion for the appointment of counsel at Government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Dawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dawkins v. Dewalt, No. CA-02-10-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2002). We deny Dawkins’ motion for the appointment of counsel at Government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dawkins v. Dewalt, 34 F. App'x 956 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

34 F. App'x 956 (Dawkins v. Dewalt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related