Dawkins v. Campbell-Robinson

72 A.D.3d 534, 898 N.Y.S.2d 454

This text of 72 A.D.3d 534 (Dawkins v. Campbell-Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dawkins v. Campbell-Robinson, 72 A.D.3d 534, 898 N.Y.S.2d 454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul Victor, J.), entered on or about August 10, 2009 and November 18, 2009, respectively, which denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motions granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff’s claims of defamation, wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress are preempted by section 301 of the federal Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (29 USC § 185), because they require interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement (Griffiths v Triangle Servs., Inc., 59 AD3d 278 [2009]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffiths v. Triangle Services, Inc.
59 A.D.3d 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.3d 534, 898 N.Y.S.2d 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawkins-v-campbell-robinson-nyappdiv-2010.