Dawes v. Sweet
14 Mass. 105
Opinion
were very clear that an action on the bond will lay, to enforce a decree of this Court rendered upon an appeal. But as a demand was necessary to be averred and proved, they gave leave to the plaintiff to amend his replication, by inserting such an averment ; and to the replication thus amended the defendants might rejoin or demur, as they should be advised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dawes v. Sweet, 14 Mass. 105 (Mass. 1817).
14 Mass. 105 (Dawes v. Sweet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Forbes v. Keyes
78 N.E. 733 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Leland v. Kingsbury
41 Mass. 315 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1836)
Newcomb v. Wing
20 Mass. 168 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1825)
Dawes v. Head
20 Mass. 128 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1825)
Newsom v. Dickerson
7 Tenn. 285 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1823)