Dawes v. Edes
13 Mass. 177
Opinion
The plain intention of the condition of the bond, as prescribed by the statute, is, to cover every thing belonging to the estate of the deceased, that snail have come to the hands of the administrator since the death of the deceased, as well before as after the execution of the bond.
Judgment according to the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dawes v. Edes, 13 Mass. 177 (Mass. 1816).
13 Mass. 177 (Dawes v. Edes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. Tuohy
854 N.E.2d 96 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2006)
Brockelman v. Western Surety Co.
11 Mass. L. Rptr. 631 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 2000)
Stevenson v. Union Indemnity Co.
28 S.W.2d 346 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1930)
Succession of Reilly v. American Bonding Co.
70 So. 237 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
People's Bank & Trust Co. v. Nelson
132 P. 493 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Lawrey v. Sterling
69 P. 460 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1902)
Connell v. McLoughlin
42 P. 218 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1895)
Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. Swinburne
30 P. 322 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1892)
Wheelock v. Commercial National Bank
8 Ohio N.P. 627 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1888)
Ætna Life Ins. v. American Surety Co.
34 F. 291 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1888)
Nichols v. Gage
10 Or. 82 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1881)
Choate v. Arrington
116 Mass. 552 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1875)
Hatch v. Inhabitants of Attleborough
97 Mass. 533 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1867)
Mathews v. Gilliss
1 Iowa 242 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1855)