Davydzenka v. Holder
This text of 474 F. App'x 147 (Davydzenka v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Sviatlana Davydzenka, a native and citizen of Belarus, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen as untimely. We have reviewed the administrative record and Davydzenka’s contentions, and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a), (c) (2012). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Davydzenka (B.I.A. Nov. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davydzenka-v-holder-ca4-2012.