Davy v. State
This text of 356 So. 2d 18 (Davy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a denial of a hearing sought under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Appellant has alleged he was induced to enter his pleas by his court appointed attorney with the assurances that he would receive no greater sentence than two concurrent life sentences and that he “would more than likely pull no more than five years.” Appellant had been charged with robbery and murder in the first degree. He pleaded to murder two and robbery and was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences and has probably come to understand since he reached prison that his chances of serving more than five years are quite assured.
Because appellant has barely alleged improper inducements, we must remand this matter for hearing under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Cooley v. State, Fla.App., 245 So.2d 679.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 So. 2d 18, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davy-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.