Davy v. Faw
1 D.C. 89
This text of 1 D.C. 89 (Davy v. Faw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davy v. Faw, 1 D.C. 89 (D.D.C. 1802).
Opinion
allowed parol evidence to show what were the accounts and contracts meant in the submission, and stopped Mr. C. Lee who had offered such evidence, and informed him that in the case of Ellzey v. Mosorop, in Washington, they had decided that where the terms of submission were uncertain, parol evidence might be given of the controversies submitted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davy-v-faw-dcd-1802.