Davy v. Faw

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Davy v. Faw

7 F. Cas. 200, 1 Cranch 89

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedApril 15, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 7 F. Cas. 200 (Davy v. Faw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davy v. Faw, 7 F. Cas. 200, 1 Cranch 89 (circtddc 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

allowed parol evidence to show what were the accounts and contracts meant in the submission, and stopped C. Lee who had offered such evidence, and informed him that in the case of Ellzey v. Mosorop [Case No. 4,412], in Washington, they had decided that where the terms of submission were uncertain, parol evidence might be given of the controversies submitted.

MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

allowed parol evidence to show what were the accounts and contracts meant in the submission, and stopped C. Lee who had offered such evidence, and informed him that in the case of Ellzey v. Mosorop [Case No. 4,412], in Washington, they had decided that where the terms of submission were uncertain, parol evidence might be given of the controversies submitted.

MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 F. Cas. 200, 1 Cranch 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davy-v-faw-circtddc-1802.