Davontae Sanford v. State of Michigan

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 24, 2020
Docket159636
StatusPublished

This text of Davontae Sanford v. State of Michigan (Davontae Sanford v. State of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davontae Sanford v. State of Michigan, (Mich. 2020).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 24, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159636 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra DAVONTAE SANFORD, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159636 COA: 341879 Court of Claims: 17-000220-MP STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff is entitled to compensation under the Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act, MCL 691.1751 et seq., for time spent in a juvenile facility before he was convicted of a crime. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 24, 2020 a0121 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davontae Sanford v. State of Michigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davontae-sanford-v-state-of-michigan-mich-2020.