Davis's Admr. v. Gray

3 Ky. Op. 594, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 512
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 30, 1869
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ky. Op. 594 (Davis's Admr. v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis's Admr. v. Gray, 3 Ky. Op. 594, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 512 (Ky. Ct. App. 1869).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

No judgment affecting the estate of a married woman, even for necessaries, can be sustained without the written authority or obligation prescribed by section 1, article 2, chapter 47 Revised Statutes.

The medical services to Mrs. Davis herself were certainly necessaries, but though she was then covert, ye there was no written authority or acknowledgment.

The statute is absolute without any express or implied qualification or exception, must be strictly construed, and operated inflexibly. This court cannot curtail or relax its literal operation.

Consequently the judgment in this case against the administrator of Mrs. Davis for the medical account against her must be adjudged erroneous, and therefore is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ky. Op. 594, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daviss-admr-v-gray-kyctapp-1869.