Davison v. T.R. Hughes, Inc.
This text of 72 S.W.3d 238 (Davison v. T.R. Hughes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Kim Davison (Davison) was formerly employed by T.R. Hughes as a co-director of sales and marketing. She sued T.R. Hughes for breach of their employment contract when the real estate company did not pay to her commissions on sales for which real estate contracts had been signed but were closed after her termination from the company. After a bench trial, the trial court found that T.R. Hughes did not breach the employment contract. Davison appeals.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 S.W.3d 238, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 669, 2002 WL 485029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davison-v-tr-hughes-inc-moctapp-2002.