Davison v. New York City Transit Authority
87 A.D.3d 608, 928 N.Y.2d 468
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 16, 2011·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The plaintiff was struck by a train and sustained personal injuries, including a fractured clavicle and a fractured scapula. Based upon the evidence presented at the trial, the award of damages for past and future pain and suffering deviated from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated herein (see CPLR 5501 [c]).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs alternative contentions. Skelos, J.R, Belen, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davison v. New York City Transit Authority, 87 A.D.3d 608, 928 N.Y.2d 468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
87 A.D.3d 608 (Davison v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kapassakis v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.
2021 NY Slip Op 02283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Vainer v. DiSalvo
107 A.D.3d 697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)