Davison v. New York City Transit Authority
This text of 87 A.D.3d 608 (Davison v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff was struck by a train and sustained personal injuries, including a fractured clavicle and a fractured scapula. Based upon the evidence presented at the trial, the award of damages for past and future pain and suffering deviated from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated herein (see CPLR 5501 [c]).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs alternative contentions. Skelos, J.R, Belen, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 A.D.3d 608, 928 N.Y.2d 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davison-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2011.