Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt

102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 117, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 633

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 7, 1920·No. 10918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

There were sufficient facts, necessarily within the knowledge of the trial judge, to have justified the reinstatement of the claim of the defendant in error, and no abuse of discretion appears. See Maddox Coffee Co. v. McHan, 22 Ga. App. 198 (2) (95 S. E. 736).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Levy and claim—motion to reinstate claim; from city court of Sandersville—Judge Jordan. August 1, 1919.

A. R, Wright, for plaintiff. M. L. Gross, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

There were sufficient facts, necessarily within the knowledge of the trial judge, to have justified the reinstatement of the claim of the defendant in error, and no abuse of discretion appears. See Maddox Coffee Co. v. McHan, 22 Ga. App. 198 (2) (95 S. E. 736).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Levy and claim—motion to reinstate claim; from city court of Sandersville—Judge Jordan. August 1, 1919.

A. R, Wright, for plaintiff. M. L. Gross, contra.

Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt, 102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 117, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 633 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

102 S.E. 840 (Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related