Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt

102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 117, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 633
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 7, 1920
Docket10918
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 840 (Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt, 102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 117, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 633 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

There were sufficient facts, necessarily within the knowledge of the trial judge, to have justified the reinstatement of the claim of the defendant in error, and no abuse of discretion appears. See Maddox Coffee Co. v. McHan, 22 Ga. App. 198 (2) (95 S. E. 736).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur. Levy and claim—motion to reinstate claim; from city court of Sandersville—Judge Jordan. August 1, 1919. A. R, Wright, for plaintiff. M. L. Gross, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington v. Quattlebaum
70 S.E.2d 367 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 117, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davisboro-fertilizer-co-v-wyatt-gactapp-1920.