Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt
102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 117, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 633
This text of 102 S.E. 840 (Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davisboro Fertilizer Co. v. Wyatt, 102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 117, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 633 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinion
There were sufficient facts, necessarily within the knowledge of the trial judge, to have justified the reinstatement of the claim of the defendant in error, and no abuse of discretion appears. See Maddox Coffee Co. v. McHan, 22 Ga. App. 198 (2) (95 S. E. 736).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Washington v. Quattlebaum
70 S.E.2d 367 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 117, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davisboro-fertilizer-co-v-wyatt-gactapp-1920.