Davis Warehouse, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis Warehouse, Inc. v. State

126 A.D.2d 957, 511 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42065

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1987

DocketClaim No. 64110

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.2d 957 (Davis Warehouse, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis Warehouse, Inc. v. State, 126 A.D.2d 957, 511 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We find that the highest and best use of the subject property was for continued industrial use for storage purposes. In determining the fair market value of the property, the court properly considered the influence of Corning Glass Works upon the market. We concur in the court’s adjustments to the comparable sale, and we conclude that the court’s determination of fair market value is proper and is consistent with the highest and best use of the property. (Appeals from judgment of Court of Claims, Hanifin, J.—appropriation.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We find that the highest and best use of the subject property was for continued industrial use for storage purposes. In determining the fair market value of the property, the court properly considered the influence of Corning Glass Works upon the market. We concur in the court’s adjustments to the comparable sale, and we conclude that the court’s determination of fair market value is proper and is consistent with the highest and best use of the property. (Appeals from judgment of Court of Claims, Hanifin, J.—appropriation.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 957, 511 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-warehouse-inc-v-state-nyappdiv-1987.