Davis Warehouse, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis Warehouse, Inc. v. State

115 A.D.2d 343, 496 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54628

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1985

DocketClaim No. 64110

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.2d 343 (Davis Warehouse, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis Warehouse, Inc. v. State, 115 A.D.2d 343, 496 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Court of Claims for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Since the court, in this appropriation proceeding, gave no explanation as to how it arrived at its value for the buildings and there is no range of values for that component of the award in the record, we must reverse the judgment (see, 1250 [344]*344Cent. Park Ave. v State of New York, 58 AD2d 688). We remit the matter to the trial court for a new decision and a new trial should the Trial Judge deem it appropriate. In the event of a new trial, the parties should exchange any additional appraisals beforehand. (Appeals from judgment of Court of Claims, Hanifin, J.—appropriation.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Court of Claims for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Since the court, in this appropriation proceeding, gave no explanation as to how it arrived at its value for the buildings and there is no range of values for that component of the award in the record, we must reverse the judgment (see, 1250 [344]*344Cent. Park Ave. v State of New York, 58 AD2d 688). We remit the matter to the trial court for a new decision and a new trial should the Trial Judge deem it appropriate. In the event of a new trial, the parties should exchange any additional appraisals beforehand. (Appeals from judgment of Court of Claims, Hanifin, J.—appropriation.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 343, 496 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-warehouse-inc-v-state-nyappdiv-1985.