Davis v. Wyer
This text of 1 D.C. 527 (Davis v. Wyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court (nem. con.) on motion, quashed the attachment' There was no evidence that a copy of the short note had been set up at the court-house door, nor that the proofs exhibited to the •justice, were lodged with the clerk. The attachment was in the [528]*528name of W. Davis, but the assignment of the account was to "W. G. Davis. The handwriting of Todhunter was not proved.
said the attachment must be in the name of the legal plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 D.C. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-wyer-dcd-1808.