Davis v. Wyer

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Davis v. Wyer

7 F. Cas. 191, 1 Cranch 527

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 7 F. Cas. 191 (Davis v. Wyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Wyer, 7 F. Cas. 191, 1 Cranch 527 (circtddc 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT (nem. con.) on motion, quashed the attachment There was no evidence that a copy of the short note had been set up at the court-house door, nor that the proofs exhibited to the justice, were lodged with the derk. The attachment was in the name of W. Davis, but the assignment of the account was to W. G. Davis. The handwriting of Todhunter was not proved.

CRANCH. Chief Judge,

said the attachment must be in the name of the legal plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT (nem. con.) on motion, quashed the attachment There was no evidence that a copy of the short note had been set up at the court-house door, nor that the proofs exhibited to the justice, were lodged with the derk. The attachment was in the name of W. Davis, but the assignment of the account was to W. G. Davis. The handwriting of Todhunter was not proved.

CRANCH. Chief Judge,

said the attachment must be in the name of the legal plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 F. Cas. 191, 1 Cranch 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-wyer-circtddc-1808.