Davis v. Wood

Supreme Court

Davis v. Wood

14 U.S. 6, 4 L. Ed. 22, 1 Wheat. 6, 1816 U.S. LEXIS 303

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 12, 1816

StatusPublished

Cited by37 cases

This text of 14 U.S. 6 (Davis v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Wood, 14 U.S. 6, 4 L. Ed. 22, 1 Wheat. 6, 1816 U.S. LEXIS 303 (1816).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.,

delivered, the opinion of the court, and stated, that, as. tp the first exception, the court had revised its opinion in the case of Mima Queen and child v. Hepburn, and confirmed it. As to the second exception, the record Was not between the same parties. The rule is, that Verdicts are evidence between parties and privies. The court does *9 not feel inclined to enlargte the exceptions to this general rule,' and, therefore, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Ch. J.,

delivered, the opinion of the court, and stated, that, as. tp the first exception, the court had revised its opinion in the case of Mima Queen and child v. Hepburn, and confirmed it. As to the second exception, the record Was not between the same parties. The rule is, that Verdicts are evidence between parties and privies. The court does *9 not feel inclined to enlargte the exceptions to this general rule,' and, therefore, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 U.S. 6, 4 L. Ed. 22, 1 Wheat. 6, 1816 U.S. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-wood-scotus-1816.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack