Davis v. Wilson
2 H. & J. 345
Opinion
were about to reverse the judgment on the form of proceedings, and to award a, procedendo, when
W. Dorsey contended, that a procedendo ought not to be awarded in a case where the court do not reverse on a bill of exceptions.
considered that there was no bill of exceptions in the case, the seals of the justices not being affixed (hereto; but there was error in the form of proceeding, and reversed the judgment without awarding & procedendo*
JUDGMENT REVERSED»
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Wilson, 2 H. & J. 345 (Md. 1806).
2 H. & J. 345 (Davis v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Express Co. v. Black
54 Ala. 177 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
United States v. Jarvis
26 F. Cas. 593 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine, 1847)