Davis v. Wilson
This text of 2 H. & J. 345 (Davis v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
were about to reverse the judgment on the form of proceedings, and to award a, procedendo, when
W. Dorsey contended, that a procedendo ought not to be awarded in a case where the court do not reverse on a bill of exceptions.
considered that there was no bill of exceptions in the case, the seals of the justices not being affixed (hereto; but there was error in the form of proceeding, and reversed the judgment without awarding & procedendo*
JUDGMENT REVERSED»
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 H. & J. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-wilson-md-1806.