Davis v. Williams
This text of 17 Misc. 2d 888 (Davis v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to appellant, and motion to consolidate granted, without costs. Respondents failed to show that consolidation would prejudice a substantial right. (Shea v. Benjamin, 275 App. Div. 1003; [889]*889Kelly v. John Vogel, Inc., 279 App. Div. 797; Tammany v. Bloom, 5 AD 2d 996.) The possibility that the action originally brought in the City Court might be settled and the Municipal Court actions severed and returned to the Municipal Court is no present valid basis for denying consolidation.
Concur — Pette, Di Gtovanna and Benjamin, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Misc. 2d 888, 191 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-williams-nyappterm-1959.