Davis v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davis v. Williams

68 S.E. 558, 8 Ga. App. 86, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 35

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 19, 1910·No. 2541·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The bailee, as a general rule, can not deny the title of his bailor; and. the facts of this case do not bring it within any exception to the rule. Patten v. Baggs, 43 Qa. 173.

[87]*87Decided July 19, 1910.

Trover; from city court of Miller county — Judge Busli. February 26, 1910.

. W. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error. Rich & Nelson, contra.'

2. The only issue in this case was whether there was a bailment or a sale; and the jury found the former; the verdict is supported, and no material error of law appears. Judgment affirmed,',

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. The bailee, as a general rule, can not deny the title of his bailor; and. the facts of this case do not bring it within any exception to the rule. Patten v. Baggs, 43 Qa. 173.

[87]*87Decided July 19, 1910.

Trover; from city court of Miller county — Judge Busli. February 26, 1910.

. W. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error. Rich & Nelson, contra.'

2. The only issue in this case was whether there was a bailment or a sale; and the jury found the former; the verdict is supported, and no material error of law appears. Judgment affirmed,',

Davis v. Williams, 68 S.E. 558, 8 Ga. App. 86, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 35 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

68 S.E. 558 (Davis v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.