Davis v. Williams

68 S.E. 558, 8 Ga. App. 86, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 35
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 19, 1910
Docket2541
StatusPublished

This text of 68 S.E. 558 (Davis v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Williams, 68 S.E. 558, 8 Ga. App. 86, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 35 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The bailee, as a general rule, can not deny the title of his bailor; and. the facts of this case do not bring it within any exception to the rule. Patten v. Baggs, 43 Qa. 173.

[87]*87Decided July 19, 1910. Trover; from city court of Miller county — Judge Busli. February 26, 1910. . W. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error. Rich & Nelson, contra.'

2. The only issue in this case was whether there was a bailment or a sale; and the jury found the former; the verdict is supported, and no material error of law appears. Judgment affirmed,',

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 558, 8 Ga. App. 86, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-williams-gactapp-1910.