Davis v. Whitney

44 A. 78, 68 N.H. 66
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

The referee has found that the use made by the defendants of their premises was reasonable. According to the decisions in this state, the defendants are entitled to judgment. *67 Bassett v. Salisbury Co., 43 N. H. 569; Hayes v. Waldron, 44 N. H. 580; Swett v. Cutts, 50 N. H. 439; Eaton v. Railroad, 51 N. H. 504, 533; Brown v. Collins, 53 N. H. 442; Haley v. Colcord, 59 N. H. 7; Green v. Gilbert, 60 N. H. 144; Rindge v. Sargent, 64 N. H. 294.

Judgment for the defendants.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Whitney, 44 A. 78, 68 N.H. 66 (N.H. 1894).

44 A. 78 (Davis v. Whitney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mesiti v. Microdot, Inc.
739 F. Supp. 57 (D. New Hampshire, 1990)
Moore v. Berlin Mills Co.
67 A. 578 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1907)