Davis v. Whitney

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Davis v. Whitney

44 A. 78, 68 N.H. 66

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 44 A. 78 (Davis v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Whitney, 44 A. 78, 68 N.H. 66 (N.H. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.

The referee has found that the use made by the defendants of their premises was reasonable. According to the decisions in this state, the defendants are entitled to judgment. *67 Bassett v. Salisbury Co., 43 N. H. 569; Hayes v. Waldron, 44 N. H. 580; Swett v. Cutts, 50 N. H. 439; Eaton v. Railroad, 51 N. H. 504, 533; Brown v. Collins, 53 N. H. 442; Haley v. Colcord, 59 N. H. 7; Green v. Gilbert, 60 N. H. 144; Rindge v. Sargent, 64 N. H. 294.

Judgment for the defendants.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

The referee has found that the use made by the defendants of their premises was reasonable. According to the decisions in this state, the defendants are entitled to judgment. *67 Bassett v. Salisbury Co., 43 N. H. 569; Hayes v. Waldron, 44 N. H. 580; Swett v. Cutts, 50 N. H. 439; Eaton v. Railroad, 51 N. H. 504, 533; Brown v. Collins, 53 N. H. 442; Haley v. Colcord, 59 N. H. 7; Green v. Gilbert, 60 N. H. 144; Rindge v. Sargent, 64 N. H. 294.

Judgment for the defendants.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A. 78, 68 N.H. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-whitney-nh-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack