Davis v. Warden
This text of Davis v. Warden (Davis v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7683
MARLIN DAVIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution at Estill,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00606-HFF)
Submitted: June 30, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlin Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marlin Davis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006)
petition. Davis also appeals the district court’s order
summarily denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Davis v. Warden, No. 3:07-cv-00606-
HFF (D.S.C. filed Feb. 12, 2008 & entered Feb. 13, 2008; July
31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-warden-ca4-2009.