Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
785 So. 2d 819, 2001 La. LEXIS 1759, 2001 WL 605615
Opinion
Concurring in the Denial of Rehearing
In Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), 772 So.2d 94, this court reversed the conditional granting of a new trial because, among other reasons, the trial judge did not specify any grounds for his decision, as required by La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 1811C(1). In the present case, the trial judge essentially gave no reasons for conditionally granting a new trial, but simply gave the same reasons he gave for granting a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 785 So. 2d 819, 2001 La. LEXIS 1759, 2001 WL 605615 (La. 2001).
785 So. 2d 819 (Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Linoski v. FLEETWOOD HOMES OF TEXAS
873 So. 2d 886 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
Hall v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
816 So. 2d 335 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)