Davis v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Davis v. Vaughn

1915 OK 229, 148 P. 137, 46 Okla. 158, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1126

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 27, 1915

Docket4411

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1915 OK 229 (Davis v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Vaughn, 1915 OK 229, 148 P. 137, 46 Okla. 158, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1126 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

RITTENHOUSE, O.

The petition in error and the transcript of the record in the ease was filed in this court on September 30, 1912, Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RITTENHOUSE, O.

The petition in error and the transcript of the record in the ease was filed in this court on September 30, 1912, Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 229, 148 P. 137, 46 Okla. 158, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-vaughn-okla-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack