Davis v. Vancil

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 2, 2015·No. SCWC-11-0000999·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000999 02-DEC-2015 08:08 AM

SCWC-11-0000999

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

SAINGOEN DAVIS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

vs.

GARY W. VANCIL; MARK VAN PERNIS; VAN PERNIS-VANCIL, A Law Corporation, Respondents/Defendants/Cross-Claim Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and

NICHOLLE DAVIS, Respondent/Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000999; CIV. NO. 08-1-352K)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Saingoen Davis’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 19, 2015, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 2, 2015.

James J. Bickerton /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Keith K. Hiraoka, James Shin, and /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Jodie D. Roeca for respondents /s/ Richard W. Pollack Gary W. Vancil, Mark Van Pernis, and /s/ Michael D. Wilson Van Pernis-Vancil, a Law Corporation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Vancil, (haw 2015).

Davis v. Vancil (Davis v. Vancil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.