Davis v. Vancil
This text of Davis v. Vancil (Davis v. Vancil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000999 02-DEC-2015 08:08 AM SCWC-11-0000999
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
SAINGOEN DAVIS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
vs.
GARY W. VANCIL; MARK VAN PERNIS; VAN PERNIS-VANCIL, A Law Corporation, Respondents/Defendants/Cross-Claim Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and NICHOLLE DAVIS, Respondent/Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000999; CIV. NO. 08-1-352K)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Saingoen Davis’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 19, 2015, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 2, 2015.
James J. Bickerton /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Keith K. Hiraoka, James Shin, and /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Jodie D. Roeca for respondents /s/ Richard W. Pollack Gary W. Vancil, Mark Van Pernis, and /s/ Michael D. Wilson Van Pernis-Vancil, a Law Corporation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis v. Vancil, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-vancil-haw-2015.