Davis v. Van Zandt

7 F. Cas. 181, 2 Cranch 208

Opinion

But THE COURT

(nem. con.) said it was not necessary to prove that fact to take the note out of the statute of limitations. The action is brought on the note, and not on the new promise.

But see Wetzel v. Bussard, 11 Wheat. [24 U. S.] 309; Read v. Wilkinson [Case No. 11, 611]; Lonsdale v. Brown [Id. 8,492].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Van Zandt, 7 F. Cas. 181, 2 Cranch 208 (circtddc 1820).

7 F. Cas. 181 (Davis v. Van Zandt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.