Davis v. Van Zandt
2 D.C. 208
This text of 2 D.C. 208 (Davis v. Van Zandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davis v. Van Zandt, 2 D.C. 208 (circtddc 1820).
Opinion
But
{nan. con.) said it was not necessary to prove that fact to take the note out of the statute of limitations. The action.is brought on the note, and not on the new promise.
(But see Wetzel v. Bussard, 11 Wheat. 309; Read v. Wilkinson, 2 Wash. C. C. Rep. 514; Lonsdale v. Brown, 3 Wash. C. C. Rep. 404.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wetzell v. Bussard
24 U.S. 309 (Supreme Court, 1826)
Lonsdale v. Brown
15 F. Cas. 851 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1818)
Read v. Wilkinson
20 F. Cas. 359 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania, 1811)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 D.C. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-van-zandt-circtddc-1820.