Davis v. UNNAMED PARTY OR PARTIES
This text of 988 A.2d 937 (Davis v. UNNAMED PARTY OR PARTIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WILIAM R. DAVIS, Plaintiff Below-Appellant,
v.
UNNAMED PARTY OR PARTIES, Defendants Below-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices.
ORDER
Henry duPont Ridgely, Justice.
This 20th day of January 2010, after careful consideration of appellant's opening brief and the record below, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated August 6, 2009. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant's complaint for personal injuries incurred on January 27, 1989 was barred by the two-year statute of limitations on such claims found in 10 Del. C. § 8119.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
988 A.2d 937, 2010 WL 376975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-unnamed-party-or-parties-del-2010.