Davis v. United States Department of Justice
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JUAN DAVIS , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v ) Civil Action No. 09-0008 (RJL) ) UNITED STATES ) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., ) F! L ) Defendants. ) , E D AUG 1 7 2009 NANCYMAYER ("*-~ u.s. ntsviiziiii'riig¢r;?;'}"
MEMORANDUM August §_, 2009
This civil action brought pro se under the Freedom of information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, is before the Court on Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 17]. By Order filed June ll, 2009, plaintiff was advised to respond to the motion by July 7, 2009, or risk the Court’s treating the motion as conceded and entering judgment for the defendants. See In re Miller, 2004 WL 963819, l (D.C. Cir., May 4, 2004) (In managing its docket under the circumstances presented, "the court may choose to . . . resolve the motion for summary judgment on the merits without an opposition . . . or [] treat summary judgment as conceded.") Plaintiff has not opposed the motion or sought additional time to do so. The Court therefore treats the motion as conceded. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum.
-cu.¢m/v-*' m Rlcri/\RILL)EON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. United States Department of Justice (Davis v. United States Department of Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.