Davis v. United States

35 C.C.P.A. 79, 1947 CCPA LEXIS 556
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedDecember 2, 1947
DocketNo. 4552
StatusPublished

This text of 35 C.C.P.A. 79 (Davis v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. United States, 35 C.C.P.A. 79, 1947 CCPA LEXIS 556 (ccpa 1947).

Opinion

Jackson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

In September 1939, appellant’s intestate, Y. W. Davis, imported at Harder, Minn., a subport within the customs district of Duluth, certain lumber invoiced as ‘ ‘ Western white spruce. ’ ’ The merchandise was shipped by the Keewatin Lumber Co., Ltd., located in Canada at Kenora, Ontario, The shipments were made from Hudson, Ontario.

The Collector of Customs assessed the imported merchandise with duty at the rate of 50 cents per thousand feet pursuant to paragraph 401 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as modified by trade agreements. That assessment is not in issue. In addition to the customs duty, an excise tax of $1.50 per thousand board feet was levied against the merchandise under section 704 (c) of the Internal Revenue Act of 1938. That law appears in the Internal Revenue Code, section 3424 (53 Stat., Part 1, 415) and reads as follows:

Sec. 3424. Lumber.
(a) Lumber, rough, or planed or dressed on one or more sides, except flooring made of maple (except Japanese maple), birch, and beech, $3 per thousand feet, board measure; but the tax on the articles described in this section shall apply only with respect to the importation of such articles. The tax imposed by this subsection shall not apply to lumber of Northern white pine (pinus strobus), Norway pine (pinus resinosa), and Western white spruce.

The above rate was modified by the following provision of the Trade Agreement with Canada (T. D. 49752) reading as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rossman v. Hedden
145 U.S. 561 (Supreme Court, 1892)
United States v. Downing
16 Ct. Cust. 556 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 C.C.P.A. 79, 1947 CCPA LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-united-states-ccpa-1947.