Davis v. United States

112 F.2d 926, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 28, 1940
DocketNo. 9293
StatusPublished

This text of 112 F.2d 926 (Davis v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. United States, 112 F.2d 926, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446 (5th Cir. 1940).

Opinion

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Alva B. Davis, and L. J. Sum-merfield, were convicted on 13' counts of an [927]*927indictment charging fraudulent use of the mails and were given general sentences of two years’ imprisonment. Summerficld has not appealed.

The fraudulent scheme charged was the selling of land in Brewster and Presidio counties, Texas, for approximately $10 an acre, to about 1,000 purchasers, through misrepresentations as to its future potential unknown mineral possibilities and its value for agricultural purposes, when in truth the laud- was not worth over $1 to $1.50 an acre. The case was tried by the judge without intervention of a jury. The printed record consists of some 550 pages, but we will not attempt to review the evidence as it is not suggested it was insufficient to support the conviction. The errors assigned are purely technical and do not affect the substantial rights of appellant. Furthermore, they are without merit.

The record presents no reversible error. 28 U.S.C.A. § 391. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 391
28 U.S.C. § 391

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 F.2d 926, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-united-states-ca5-1940.