Davis v. United States

271 F. App'x 366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 F. App'x 130
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2008·No. No. 08-6013·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Davis appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. USA, No. 1:07-cv-00063-IMK-JES, 2007 WL 3473275 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. United States, 271 F. App'x 366 (4th Cir. 2008).

271 F. App'x 366 (Davis v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related