Davis v. Union Supply Co.

185 F.2d 968, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3392
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 26, 1950
Docket12983
StatusPublished

This text of 185 F.2d 968 (Davis v. Union Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Union Supply Co., 185 F.2d 968, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3392 (5th Cir. 1950).

Opinion

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by Union Supply Company, a New Mexico Corporation, against the Country Club of Levelland, Texas, the Levelland State Bank and the First National Bank of Levelland, all Texas corporations, and seeks to recover the proceeds of a check for $5650.22, payable to the order of the plaintiff, Union Supply Company, and drawn by the Country Club of Levelland through the First National Bank.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the check in question was taken from plaintiff’s possession without its knowledge and consent and without negligence on its part, and was endorsed “Union Supply Co., Inc., B. J. Hargroves”, after which it was cashed and plaintiff did not receive the proceeds. The check was issued in payment of merchandise sold by plaintiff to the Country Club of Levelland, and plaintiff seeks recovery from the defendants, jointly and severally, for the amount of the check, plus interest and costs.

The Levelland State Bank filed an answer alleging that one Brady J. Childress presented the check in question to it, endorsed as above alleged, and requested that the proceeds thereof be credited to the account of B. J. Hargroves in that bank, which was done; that B. J. Hargroves had been employed by the Union Supply Company for several months prior to March, 1948, had frequently endorsed and cashed checks payable to the Company, and either had actual authority to endorse and cash such checks, or by course of dealing had apparent authority to so act. It further alleged that Bruce B. Nesbitt, one of the vice presidents of the Union Supply Company, knew on March 18, 1948, that the check had been drawn but raised no question in regard to it, and made no claim until after the first of May, 1948, by which time Hargroves had drawn the proceeds of the check out of his account; that plaintiff, the Union Supply Company, could and should have discovered by the exercise of proper care and diligence that it had not received the proceeds of the check long before May 1, 1948, and while the defendant, Levelland State Bank, still had the proceeds or a substantial part thereof on hand to the credit of Hargroves, and could have thereby prevented the loss, or a large share thereof; that the Union Supply Company was negligent in the manner in which it conducted its business, in permitting Hargroves to ■have access to checks drawn upon it, in permitting him to endorse and cash such checks; and that, had proper diligence been exercised by the Union Supply Company prior to March 18, 1948, the defalcations of Hargroves could and should have been discovered and the loss resulting from the cashing of the check would have been averted.

The First National Bank of Levelland and the Country Club of Levelland also filed answers to the complaint, but both these defendants were later dismissed from the suit, and no complaint or issue is raised in regard to such” dismissals.

Levelland State Bank, on motion, was permitted by the court to bring in B. J. Hargroves, Brady J. Childress and Sherman Davis as third party defendants upon alleging, in substance, that prior to the issuance of the check in dispute Hargroves and Childress had entered into a plan or scheme whereby Hargroves would endorse various and sundry checks which had been delivered to Union Supply Company in payment for merchandise, and Childress would either cash such checks or have them cashed, after which the proceeds thereof would be used for their joint benefit, including the $5650.22 check in question. It was further alleged that Sherman Davis had obtained $1300 out of the proceeds of the check, knowing the source of the funds, and under such circumstances as to amount to bad faith on his part, and that Level-land State Bank, in the event it was held liable to reimburse plaintiff for the proceeds of the check, was therefore entitled to recover over and against Sherman Davis for the $1300, with interest and costs. Both Childress and Davis filed answers denying the allegations of the third party complaint.

*970 . The case was submitted to a jury on special issues, and the jury found (1) that B. J. Hargroves did not have actual authority to endorse the check; (2) that Union Supply Company was not negligent in failing to discover sooner than it did that the check had been endorsed by B. J. Hargroves; (3) that Sherman Davis collected $1300 from the proceeds of the check under such circumstances as to amount to bad faith, and (4) that B. J. Hargroves and Brady J. Childress knowingly and wilfully entered into a plan or scheme to defraud the bank out of the proceeds of the check in question.

The trial court entered judgment based on the jury’s verdict in favor of Union Supply Company, and against the Level-land State Bank, for the sum of $5650.22, with interest and costs of suit. Judgment was also entered on the basis of the third party complaint over and against B. J. Hargroves and Brady J. Childress, jointly and severally, for the same amount, and against Sherman Davis for $1300, with interest and costs, on the condition that if and when same was satisfied that amount should be credited against the judgment over and against Hargroves and Childress.

Motions for new trial by Sherman Davis, Brady Childress, and Levelland State Bank were all overruled by the trial ■ court, and each of these parties defendant has appealed.

The important and material evidence, briefly summarized, reveals that Union Supply Company was engaged in the business of selling hardware, mill supplies and equipment used in and about the drilling of oil wells;' th'at its main place of business was located at Artesia, New Mexico, but it also operated a branch store at Sundown, Texas; that B. J. Hargroves, a kinsman of one of the officers of the Company, worked as a trusted employee in the Sundown branch store and sold much merchandise to customers' of the Company, receiving in payment therefor both cash and checks; that while acting in that capacity Hargroves, who was an immature boy about 19 or 20 years of age, became well acquainted with one Brady J. Childress, a bootlegger and professional gambler, and as time passed they became close companions. On several occasions Childress sold liquor to Hargroves and was paid by Hargroves from the proceeds of Union Supply Company checks. Hargroves later fell completely under the influence of Childress and became his partner in certain gambling ventures. They had an arrangement whereby Childress would play poker at gambling parties for Hargroves, using funds from Union Supply -Company checks endorsed , and cashed by Hargroves, and they would divide the losses or gains equally. After some time the losses of Hargroves mounted, and the money which was passed to Childress by means of Company checks steadily increased in amount.

With reference to the $5,650.22 check in question, the evidence is practically without dispute that Childress went to see Hargroves one day in March, 1948, and told him he planned a trip to Lu'bbock, Texas, that evening to gamble, and asked Hargroves if he had any money and “wanted in on it”. Hargroves told him about the check in dispute and stated that he had a $1300 interest in it. That evening Childress and Hargroves went to Lubbock together to join in a poker game at the home of Sherman Davis, a professional gambler. Childress introduced Hargroves to Davis, and they showed the check to Davis with the request that he cash it for them so they could obtain $1300 with which to gamble.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beland v. United States
100 F.2d 289 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)
Peoples Nat. Bank v. Guier
145 S.W.2d 1042 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1940)
Kentucky Rock Asphalt Co. v. Mazza's Adm'r
94 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1936)
Western Produce Co. v. Citizens State Bank
113 S.W.2d 951 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Johnston v. Andrade
54 S.W.2d 1029 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Glasscock v. First National Bank
266 S.W. 393 (Texas Supreme Court, 1924)
Texas Public Utilities Corp. v. Edwards
99 S.W.2d 420 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Fenner v. American Surety Co. of New York
156 S.W.2d 279 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 F.2d 968, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-union-supply-co-ca5-1950.