Davis v. Town of Cary

633 F. App'x 201
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 29, 2016
DocketNos. 15-2275, 15-2276, 15-2277, 15-2278
StatusPublished

This text of 633 F. App'x 201 (Davis v. Town of Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Town of Cary, 633 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Town of Cary, No. 5:08-cv-00176-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 19, 2015 & entered Aug. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [202]*202the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-town-of-cary-ca4-2016.