Davis v. Town of Cary

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Town of Cary

633 F. App'x 201

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 29, 2016·No. Nos. 15-2275, 15-2276, 15-2277, 15-2278·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Town of Cary, No. 5:08-cv-00176-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 19, 2015 & entered Aug. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [202] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Town of Cary, No. 5:08-cv-00176-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 19, 2015 & entered Aug. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [202] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Davis v. Town of Cary, 633 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

633 F. App'x 201 (Davis v. Town of Cary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.