Davis v. . Toulmin

77 N.Y. 280, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 771
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 20, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 77 N.Y. 280 (Davis v. . Toulmin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. . Toulmin, 77 N.Y. 280, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 771 (N.Y. 1879).

Opinion

Church, Ch. J.

The action was for contribution between co-sureties. The exception raises the question whether in such an action, it is competent for the defendant to avail himself of an indebtedness of the plaintiff to the principal, as a defense.

The authorities are decisive against it. ( O’Blemis v. Karing, 57 N. Y., 649; Lasher v. Williams, 55 id., 619; Springer v. Dwyer, 50 id., 19.) If the co-surety suing for contribution has received any money or property as payment, or security from the principal, he will be obliged to account for the same, but a simple indebtedness to the principle cannot be availed of by the defendant. In case of insolvency there may be cases where equity having all the parties before it might relieve, but no such question is presented in this case.

We concur with the opinion at Special Term.

The judgment must be affirmed.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

F. A. Rumery Co. v. Merrill Trust Co.
143 A. 54 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1928)
Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. Park
29 N.E. 444 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 N.Y. 280, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-toulmin-ny-1879.