Davis v. Thompson
14 A. 169, 10 Sadler 563, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 986
This text of 14 A. 169 (Davis v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davis v. Thompson, 14 A. 169, 10 Sadler 563, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 986 (Pa. 1888).
Opinion
There is nothing at all in this case which requires consideration. That the action of trover does not lie for the recovery of [566]*566a debt, or for damages arising from the breach of a contract, is a proposition too plain for discussion.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.
28 A.2d 334 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Sterrett v. Royal Indemnity Co.
26 Pa. D. & C. 254 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Cherry Ex Rel. Cherkasky v. Paller
91 Pa. Super. 417 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Hartford v. Smith
199 F. 763 (Third Circuit, 1912)
Sutterly v. Fleshman
41 Pa. Super. 131 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
V. P. Randolph & Co. v. Walker
59 S.E. 856 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1907)
Succession of Marchand
2 Teiss. 261 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1905)
Alfred Shrimpton & Sons v. Culver
67 N.W. 907 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)
Harang v. Blanc
34 La. 632 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 A. 169, 10 Sadler 563, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-thompson-pa-1888.