Davis v. Thompson Coburn, LLP

Missouri Court of Appeals

Davis v. Thompson Coburn, LLP

422 S.W.3d 456, 2013 WL 6912811, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1560

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 2013·No. No. ED 99784·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs — James P. Davis, Sr., and Quarry Holding Company — appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants in plaintiffs’ action for attorneys’ fees. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs — James P. Davis, Sr., and Quarry Holding Company — appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants in plaintiffs’ action for attorneys’ fees. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Davis v. Thompson Coburn, LLP, 422 S.W.3d 456, 2013 WL 6912811, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1560 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

422 S.W.3d 456 (Davis v. Thompson Coburn, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.