Davis v. Taylor-Wilkes Helicopter Service, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMarch 9, 2000
DocketI.C. NO. 722198.
StatusPublished

This text of Davis v. Taylor-Wilkes Helicopter Service, Inc. (Davis v. Taylor-Wilkes Helicopter Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Taylor-Wilkes Helicopter Service, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2000).

Opinion

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Dollar. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission reverses the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award and enters the following Opinion and Award.

* * * * * * * * * * *
Any attachments to the Brief of the Plaintiff which were not admitted into evidence at the hearing before the deputy commissioner are hereby STRICKEN from the record.

* * * * * * * * * * *
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. On 13 July 1995, plaintiff was injured when a highboy sprayer he was driving hit a hole and fell over.

2. Defendant Taylor Manufacturing, Inc. (hereinafter called TMI) was a North Carolina corporation and was a duly qualified self-insured, with Riscorp as the servicing agent.

3. TMI had an umbrella policy of workers' compensation which was in effect on or about 13 July 1995, and which covered all of the Taylor Companies, including TMI, Taylor-Wilkes Helicopter Service, Inc. (hereinafter called TWHS), Taylor Products, Inc., and National Leasing Corp.

4. Plaintiff was employed by TMI from 1 November 1990 through 28 June 1990. He was then employed by TWHS from 28 June 1990 through 25 October 1990, and he returned to TMI from 25 October 1990 to 18 March 1991. Plaintiff was terminated from TMI on 18 March 1991, because the company considered him a health risk.

5. Plaintiff was performing work under a federal government contract with the USDA to spray witchweed on 13 July 1995.

6. The parties stipulated the following documentary evidence into the record:

a. New Hanover Regional Medical Center Records, eighty pages,

b. Southeastern Orthopaedic Clinic Records, eight pages,

c. Duke University Medical Center Records, 116 pages,

d. North Carolina Industrial Commission letters, two pages,

e. Report of Thomas Baldwin, nine pages,

f. Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's Discovery, 119 pages,

g. Plaintiff's Responses to Defendants' Discovery, twenty-four pages,

h. Insurance documents, five pages,

i. Bladen Medical Associates Records, twenty-five pages,

j. Industrial Commission Forms from files 722198 and 121630, and,

k. Witchweed contract and other relevant information, four pages.

* * * * * * * * * * *
The Full Commission finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was sixty-five years old at the time of the hearing before the deputy commissioner. He attended school through the third grade and is able to read and sign his name, but he is functionally illiterate. Plaintiff has worked as a farm hand, a lumber mill worker, a farm machine builder, a crop sprayer, and as a self-employed mechanic.

2. From 1961 through 1974, plaintiff was employed during the months of March through October by TWHS to prepare and maintain crop spraying equipment. For the remainder of the year, plaintiff was employed by Taylor-Wilkes Massey Ferguson where he repaired farm machinery. As the Taylor family owned both of these businesses, it was not unusual to assign the employees to work where they were needed.

3. Witchweed is a parasite which attacks blade crops. Since 1961, TWHS has been awarded the contract with the United States Department of Agriculture (hereinafter, "USDA") for spraying to eradicate witchweed. At one time, the USDA awarded contracts for up to 50,000 acres per county. However, due to the success of the spraying, witchweed is largely under control in Southeastern North Carolina. By 1994, the USDA allotted only 1,300 acres to TWHS for spraying.

4. In 1974, plaintiff quit his job with defendants. He and his wife opened a convenience store and repair business which they operated for fourteen years, until his wife died in 1988.

5. In 1989, Ron Taylor rehired plaintiff to work at TWHS during the witchweed season and at TMI for the rest of the year. Plaintiff was paid $400.00 per week.

6. On 23 January 1991, plaintiff sustained a compensable on-the-job injury which was the subject of I.C. File No. 121630. Plaintiff received six weeks of benefits for this injury.

7. On 18 March 1991, TMI terminated plaintiff's employment. Personnel records reflect that plaintiff was not to be rehired because he was considered a health risk. At all times while employed by TMI or TWHS before 18 March 1991, plaintiff received a W-2 form from his employer which reflected the withholdings from his pay for taxes and social security. Plaintiff was an employee of TMI or TWHS while performing services for the respective company.

8. In 1992, plaintiff negotiated with Ron Taylor, in Taylor's capacity as president of TWHS, to allow plaintiff to perform TWHS's contract with the USDA. Plaintiff and Taylor agreed that plaintiff would not be hired as an employee but would be hired as an independent contractor. Plaintiff understood that Taylor and defendant-employers were unwilling to rehire him as an employee.

9. In the years from 1992 through the date of the injury in 1995, plaintiff performed witchweed spraying as he had when defendants recognized him as an employee, with a few exceptions: plaintiff was hired and paid only by TWHS and only during the witchweed season, and TWHS issued a IRS Form 1099 at the end of the year and did not deduct taxes from plaintiff's pay. As was the situation when plaintiff was an employee with defendants, an employee of TMI ordered all of plaintiff's spraying parts and chemicals for the spraying jobs, and TMI employees delivered a highboy tractor to the job sites for plaintiff's use. Plaintiff's primary assistant, Cleo McCoy, was an acknowledged employee of defendants. Plaintiff used TWHS equipment, parts, and water. On days when inclement weather prevented plaintiff from spraying, he worked at the main TMI plant driving a forklift and doing odd jobs at the direction of Ron Taylor or TMI employees; however, there is no evidence that TMI did or did not pay plaintiff for these services. Because of his years of experience, plaintiff needed no supervision from TWHS in the performance of his spraying duties. USDA agents directed plaintiff to the various fields to be sprayed and remained on site to view the spraying. Plaintiff performed spraying only for TWHS and was not engaged in an independent business or occupation, did not hire his own assistants, and worked for TWHS under the supervision of the USDA.

10. Before plaintiff returned to work for TWHS in 1992, he signed a subcontractor's waiver of workers' compensation coverage at Ron Taylor's request. Plaintiff signed this agreement voluntarily. The agreement provided that it was to be effective until the expiration date of TWHS's then-current workers' compensation policy, which was renewable yearly. However, there is no evidence that, in 1992, TWHS or Ron Taylor agreed to hire plaintiff in any subsequent witchweed season, nor is there any evidence that the waiver signed in 1992 was applicable in any subsequent year in which plaintiff might be hired, including 1995.

11. At the end of the witchweed season in 1992, TWHS's contract with USDA in 1992 was concluded. TWHS's contract in 1995 was a new contract for witchweed spraying. Likewise, plaintiff's employment with TWHS in 1995 was a new contract for performing the spraying.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grouse v. DRB Baseball Management, Inc.
465 S.E.2d 568 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Williams v. ARL, INC.
516 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Hoffman v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.
293 S.E.2d 807 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
Joyner v. AJ CAREY OIL COMPANY
146 S.E.2d 447 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Barber v. Going West Transportation, Inc.
517 S.E.2d 914 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Hayes v. . Elon College
29 S.E.2d 137 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College
224 N.C. 11 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davis v. Taylor-Wilkes Helicopter Service, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-taylor-wilkes-helicopter-service-inc-ncworkcompcom-2000.