Davis v. Tanner

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 27, 2009
• Docket: 08-8103
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8103

THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ANGELA MCCALL TANNER; KIMBERLY SMITH, Ex Solicitor; MCDUFFEY STONE, III, Head Solicitor; ALEXANDER ROBINSON, Solicitor; LARRY WEIDNER, Private Attorney; PERRY M. BUCKNER, Judge; CARMEN T. MULLEN; JAMES E. LOCKEMY; HOWARD P. KING, Judge; J. ERNEST KINARD, Judge; O. G. CHASE, Magistrate Judge; NANCY SADLER, Magistrate Judge; BRYANT BEARED, Head Chief Detective; LARRY D. EHLER; MICHAEL R. SEWARD,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:08-cv-02248-GRA)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Louis Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Louis Davis appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying

reconsideration thereof. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Davis v. Tanner, No. 9:08-cv-

02248-GRA (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED