Davis v. Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc

District Court, E.D. Washington·Decided May 3, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-00060·Unknown

Opinion

FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON May 03, 2021 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK

EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

ERICA DAVIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of NO: 2:20-CV-60-RMP Andrew Davis, deceased, and the minor child JC, and minor child SD; PROTECTIVE ORDER MICHAEL M. MASCHMEYER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of R. Wayne Estopinal, decease; and JAMES JOHNSON and BRADLEY HERMAN, individually and as Independent Co-administrators of the Estate of Sandra Johnson, deceased;

Plaintiffs,

v.

GROUP, INC., and CANFIELD

Defendants.

BEFORE THE COURT is a Stipulated Motion for Protective Order, ECF No. 61. A district court may issue protective orders regarding discovery upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). Before issuing a stipulated protective order, a district court judge should ensure that the protective order’s restrictions do not infringe on the public’s general right to inspect and copy judicial records and documents. See Kamakana v. City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006); see also Courthouse News Serv. v. Planet, 947 F.3d 581, 589 (9th Cir.

2020) (recognizing a long-held First Amendment right of access to court proceedings and documents). Having reviewed the protective order and the remaining record, the Court

finds good cause to grant the stipulated motion and enter the agreed-upon protective order and exhibit. Accordingly, the parties’ stipulated protective order, ECF No. 61, is GRANTED, and the protective order is entered in the form set forth below.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if, in the course of this proceeding, any party or nonparty has the occasion to disclose information deemed in good faith to constitute confidential material, as defined below, the following procedures shall be

employed and the following restrictions shall govern the handling of documents, depositions, pleadings, exhibits, and all other information exchanged by the parties or nonparties hereto.

1. SCOPE 1.1.1. This Protective Order shall govern the designation, disclosure, dissemination, and use of Confidential Material (as defined below) provided by any parties or nonparties to meet disclosure obligations in the above-captioned proceeding (the “Action”). 1.1.2. As used herein, the term “Confidential Material” shall mean information (regardless of how generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things

that qualify for protection under standards developed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), including trade secrets or confidential research, development, or commercial information. Confidential Material may include, without limitation,

programming records, designs, processes, test data and reports, engineering documents, drawings, schematics, financial statements, accounting records, e-mails, and other confidential business records. Confidential Material may also include Plaintiffs’ decedent’s medical and health care records, prescription and non

prescription medicinal records, coroner records, estate records, employment records, pilot records, income tax records, worker’s compensation records or other private personal information, including personal and company emails, personal computer,

cell phone, text and social media records, and credit or debit card records. 2. DESIGNATION 2.1.1. In accordance with this Protective Order, any party or

subpoenaed nonparty may designate any Confidential Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” in this Action if it believes in good faith that the material constitutes or embodies information that (a) satisfies the definition of Confidential Material in the foregoing Paragraph 2, (b) is not generally known, and (c) the designating party would not normally reveal to third parties or would cause third parties to maintain in confidence. 2.1.2. Any party or nonparty may designate documents or other tangible things as CONFIDENTIAL in this Action by placing the following legend or a

similar legend on the document or thing, and each page thereof: CONFIDENTIAL; provided, however, that in the event original documents are produced for inspection, the producing party shall place the appropriate legend on the documents in the

copying process. For documents in the form of data, software, or digital material stored electronically or on an electronic storage device, a party may designate a document as CONFIDENTIAL for protection under this Order by placing a “CONFIDENTIAL” legend (i) on the data (e.g., an electronic stamp or notation in

the database or load files), or (ii) on the device containing the data. 2.1.3. Any party or nonparty may designate discovery requests or responses (and the information contained therein) as CONFIDENTIAL in this

Action by placing the following legend on the face of any such document: CONFIDENTIAL. In the case of discovery requests or responses, a statement may also be included within the document specifying the portion(s) thereof having been

designated as CONFIDENTIAL. 2.1.4. Any party or nonparty may designate depositions and other testimony (including exhibits) as CONFIDENTIAL in this Action by (a) indicating on the record at the time the testimony is given that the entire testimony or portions thereof shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL, or (b) by captioned, written notice to the reporter and all counsel of record, given within two weeks after the reporter sends written notice to the deponent or the deponent’s counsel that the transcript is available for review (the “holding period”), in which case all counsel receiving such

notice shall be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript or portion thereof in their possession or control as directed by the producing party or deponent. If no such designation is made at the deposition, or during the holding

period, no such deposition transcript shall be disclosed to any person other than those persons who are entitled to have access to such materials pursuant to Paragraph 14 below and the deponent (and the deponent’s counsel in the case of a separately represented nonparty), and no person attending such a deposition shall disclose

the contents of the deposition to any person other than those described in Paragraphs 14 or 15 below during the holding period. The following legend shall be placed on the front of any deposition transcript (and, if videotaped, any copies of the videotape) containing

CONFIDENTIAL information: CONFIDENTIAL. 2.1.5. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate Confidential Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not, standing alone, waive the

designating party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as CONFIDENTIAL after the material was initially produced, the receiving party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the Confidential Material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 2.1.6. A party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of any designation of Confidential Material as CONFIDENTIAL at the time of designation,

and a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge to the designation. Notwithstanding anything in this Protective Order to the contrary, the parties acknowledge and agree that each party reserves the right to argue that any

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc, (E.D. Wash. 2021).

Davis v. Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc (Davis v. Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Courthouse News Service v. Michael Planet
947 F.3d 581 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)