Davis v. Suter

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided November 24, 2009·No. Civil Action No. 2009-1989·Published

Opinion

FILED NOV .2 4 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURI'

) LEANDER G. DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1989 ) WILLIAM K. SUTER, et at., ) ) Defendants. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiff s application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted but the

complaint will be dismissed.

The instant complaint is practically identical to a separate complaint that the Court has

dismissed with prejudice. Davis v. Suter, No. 09cv1990, 2009 WL 3483974 (D.D.C. Oct. 21,

2009) (Memorandum and Dismissal Order). The Court will dismiss the instant civil action as

duplicative.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately on this same

date.

United States District Judge DATE: \\) \\)0)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Suter, (D.D.C. 2009).

Davis v. Suter (Davis v. Suter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.