Davis v. Summitt

129 S.E.2d 588, 259 N.C. 57, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 478
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 6, 1963·No. 176·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The jurisdictional facts, including the average weekly wage, were stipulated. The evidence was sufficient to permit the finding that claimant suffered a compensable injury by accident arising out of and in the cqurse of his employment. The defendants’ objections go to the weight of the evidence rather than to its competency. The weight was for the Commission. The judgment awarding compensation is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Summitt, 129 S.E.2d 588, 259 N.C. 57, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 478 (N.C. 1963).

129 S.E.2d 588 (Davis v. Summitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caskie v. R. M. Butler & Co.
354 S.E.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)
Pittman v. Inco, Inc.
336 S.E.2d 637 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Key v. Wagner Woodcraft, Inc.
235 S.E.2d 254 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Russell v. Pharr Yarns, Inc.
196 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Bigelow v. Tire Sales Company
182 S.E.2d 856 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Pardue v. BLACKBURN BROTHERS OIL & TIRE COMPANY
132 S.E.2d 747 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANY
130 S.E.2d 342 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)